Linnean Society
in London, jointly
with Wallace's
paper.
Darwin's book
On the Origin of
Species by Means of
Natural Selection
was published one
year later, and was
of sufficient
interest to have the
publisher's stocks
completely sold to
bookstores on the
first day.
It provoked an
outraged response
from the
Church. A large
meeting was
organised in
Oxford where
'Soapy Sam'
Wilberforce, the
Bishop of
Oxford, numerous
Clergy and Robert
Fitzroy (the Captain
of HMS Beagle)
argued against
Darwin,
Thomas Huxley
and their
Evolutionist
supporters. On being
asked by
Wilberforce, whether
he was descended
from monkeys on his
grandfather's side
or his grandmother's
side, Huxley,
recognizing the
stupidity of the
question, apparently
muttered to himself:
"The lord has
delivered him into
my hands", and then
replied that he
"would rather be
descended from an
ape than from a
cultivated man who
used his gifts of
culture and
eloquence in the
service of prejudice
and falsehood"
[several alternative
versions of this
supposed quote
exist, see
Wilberforce and
Huxley: A Legendary
Encounter.
In several of his
later books The
Variation of Animals
and Plants Under
Domestication (1868),
The Descent of
Man, and Selection
in Relation to S--
(1871)
and The
Expression of
Emotions in Animals
and Man (1872),
Darwin expanded on
many topics
introduced in
Origin of Species.
The value of
Darwin's work was
appreciated
throughout the
scientific
community. He became
a member of the
Royal Society of
London in
1839 (on the
basis of his
collecting during
his voyages) and of
the
French Academy of
Sciences (l'Acad?ie
des Sciences)
in
1878
Darwin died in
Downe,
Kent, England,
on 19 April
1882 was given a
state funeral, and
interred in
Westminster Abbey
near
Isaac Newton.
Darwin was given
particular
recognition in
2000 when his
image appeared on
the
Bank of England
ten pound note,
replacing
Charles Dickens.
His impressive and
supposedly
hard-to-forge beard
was reportedly a
contributing factor
in this choice.
Before the
nineteenth century,
the accepted theory
for the extinction
of species was
called
Catastrophism,
which stated that
species went extinct
due to catastrophes
that were often
followed by the
formation of new
species ex
nihilo (out of
nothing). The
extinct species can
then be found as
fossils. The new
species were
considered
unchangeable. This
theory was in
accordance with the
story of the Flood
in the
Bible. In the
early nineteenth
century, several new
theories started to
compete with
Catastrophism. One
of the most
important ones was
developed by
Jean-Baptiste
Lamarck
(1744-1829). He
observed that every
new generation
inherits the traits
of its ancestors. He
suggested that
traits or organs
become enhanced with
repeated use and
weakened or removed
by disuse in each
individual, who will
pass these
improvements or
losses directly to
their offspring. In
1830, the
British geologist
Sir
Charles Lyell
disproved the
Catastrophism Theory,
but held on to the
theory of species
staying unchanged
during time. Lyell
founded
uniformitarianism,
a theory stating
that the surface of
earth changed slowly
through eons by
constant forces.
Darwin's theory
of evolution is
based on five key
observations and
inferences drawn
from them. These
observations and
inferences have been
summarized by the
great biologist
Ernst Mayr as
follows: First,
species have great
fertility. They make
more offspring than
can grow to
adulthood. Second,
populations remain
roughly the same
size, with modest
fluctuations. Third,
food resources are
limited, but are
relatively constant
most of the time.
From these three
observations it may
be inferred that in
such an environment
there will be a
struggle for
survival among
individuals. Fourth,
in s--ually
reproducing species,
generally no two
individuals are
identical. Variation
is rampant. And
fifth, much of this
variation is
heritable. From this
it may be inferred:
In a world of stable
populations where
each individual must
struggle to survive,
those with the
"best"
characteristics will
be more likely to
survive, and those
desirable traits
will be passed to
their offspring.
These advantageous
characteristics are
inherited by
following
generations,
becoming dominant
among the population
through time (Fig.
2). This is natural
selection. It may be
further inferred
that natural
selection, if
carried far enough,
makes changes in a
population,
eventually leading
to new species.
These observations
have been amply
demonstrated in
biology, and even
fossils demonstrate
the veracity of
these observations.
Darwin imagined
it might be possible
that all life is
descended from an
original species
from ancient times.
DNA evidence
supports this idea.
After the
publication of
Darwin's book,
evolution as the
means of natural
selection was widely
discussed (Fig. 3),
particularly by the
religious and the
scientific
communities. Though
Darwin was supported
by some scientists
(e.g.,
T.H. Huxley),
others hesitated to
accept the theory
due to the
unexplained ability
of individuals to
pass their special
abilities to their
offspring. The last
point remained a
mystery until the
existence of
genes was
discovered. In
1902
Peter Kropotkin
published the book
Mutual Aid: A Factor
of Evolution,
challenging Darwin's
Theory as too
narrow. In
1874, the
theologian Charles
Hodge accused Darwin
of denying the
existence of God by
defining humans to
be a result of a
natural process
rather than a
creation designed by
God. Darwin's theory
is now backed up by
the comparison of
DNA from different
organisms which
shows the closeness
of their
relationship.
Today, whilst the
overwhelming
majority of
biologists consider
Darwin's basic
theory correct, a
significant fraction
of the general
population,
particularly in the
United States
amongst Western
countries, do not do
so on religious
grounds. See
Pseudoscience
creationism.
Contrary to
popular opinion,
Darwin did not
"discover"
evolution as it
was accepted by many
since the beginning
of the
1800s. Instead,
he and Wallace
discovered the first
really coherent
mechanism that
explains how
evolution occurs (natural
selection).
Other important
aspects of Darwin's
overall theory were:
common descent,
s--ual selection,
gradualism, and
pangenesis. It
is important to
remember that
Darwin's version of
natural selection
was different from
that presented by
Wallace in that he
held that natural
selection was
continuously
operating, whereas
Wallace argued that
selection only
occurred when the
environment changed.

Figure 3 :
Caricature of Darwin
as an ape in the
Hornet
magazine. (Image
in the PD)
Darwin is
included in the top
10 of the
100 Greatest Britons
poll sponsored by
the
BBC and voted
for by the public.
It has been
falsely claimed that
Darwin converted to
Christianity on
his deathbed. The
claim can be
dismissed by his
never having
renounced the
church. This claim
is discussed in
The Survival of
Charles Darwin: A
Biography of a Man
and an Idea, by
Ronald W. Clark
(Weidenfeld &
Nicholson 1985), p.
199:
- "Shortly
after his death,
Lady Hope
addressed a
gathering of
young men and
women at the
educational
establishment
founded by the
evangelist
Dwight Lyman
Moody at
Northfield,
Massachusetts.
She had, she
maintained,
visited Darwin
on his deathbed.
He had been
reading the
Epistle to the
Hebrews, had
asked for the
local Sunday
school to sing
in a summerhouse
on the grounds,
and had
confessed: 'How
I wish I had not
expressed my
theory of
evolution as I
have done.' He
went on, she
said, to say
that he would
like her to
gather a
congregation
since he 'would
like to speak to
them of Christ
Jesus and His
salvation, being
in a state where
he was eagerly
savouring the
heavenly
anticipation of
bliss.'
- "With
Moody's
encouragement,
Lady Hope's
story was
printed in the
Boston Watchman
Examiner. The
story spread,
and the claims
were republished
as late as
October 1955 in
the Reformation
Review and in
the Monthly
Record of the
Free Church of
Scotland in
February 1957.
These attempts
to fudge
Darwin's story
had already been
exposed for what
they were, first
by his daughter
Henrietta after
they had been
revived in 1922.
'I was present
at his
deathbed,' she
wrote in the
Christian for
February 23,
1922. 'Lady Hope
was not present
during his last
illness, or any
illness. I
believe he never
even saw her,
but in any case
she had no
influence over
him in any
department of
thought or
belief. He never
recanted any of
his scientific
views, either
then or earlier.
We think the
story of his
conversion was
fabricated in
the U.S.A. . . .
The whole story
has no
foundation
whatever.'"
(Ellipsis
original.)
In the introduction
of The Descent
of Man (1871),
Darwin wrote:
- "Ignorance
more frequently
begets
confidence than
does knowledge:
it is those who
know little, and
not those who
know much, who
so positively
assert that this
or that problem
will never be
solved by
science."
Later on in the book
he dismisses an
argument for
religion being
innate:
- "Belief in
God- Religion.-
There is no
evidence that
man was
aboriginally
endowed with the
ennobling belief
in the existence
of an Omnipotent
God. On the
contrary there
is ample
evidence,
derived not from
hasty travellers,
but from men who
have long
resided with
savages, that
numerous races
have existed,
and still exist,
who have no idea
of one or more
gods, and who
have no words in
their languages
to express such
an idea. The
question is of
course wholly
distinct from
that higher one,
whether there
exists a Creator
and Ruler of the
universe; and
this has been
answered in the
affirmative by
some of the
highest
intellects that
have ever
existed."
- "The belief
in God has often
been advanced as
not only the
greatest, but
the most
complete of all
the distinctions
between man and
the lower
animals. It is
however
impossible, as
we have seen, to
maintain that
this belief is
innate or
instinctive in
man. On the
other hand a
belief in
all-pervading
spiritual
agencies seems
to be universal;
and apparently
follows from a
considerable
advance in man's
reason, and from
a still greater
advance in his
faculties of
imagination,
curiosity and
wonder. I am
aware that the
assumed
instinctive
belief in God
has been used by
many persons as
an argument for
His existence.
But this is a
rash argument,
as we should
thus be
compelled to
believe in the
existence of
many cruel and
malignant
spirits, only a
little more
powerful than
man; for the
belief in them
is far more
general than in
a beneficent
Deity. The idea
of a universal
and beneficent
Creator does not
seem to arise in
the mind of man,
until he has
been elevated by
long-continued
culture."
Darwin's own
struggle with faith
got sharper the
older he became, and
his
posthumously-published
autobiography
contained quotes
about Christianity
that were omitted by
Darwin's wife Emma
and his son Francis
because they were
deemed dangerous for
Charles Darwin's
reputation. Only in
1958 Darwin's
granddaughter Nora
Barlow published a
revised version
which contained the
omissions. This
included statements
such as:
- "Whilst on
board the Beagle
(October
1836-January
1839) I was
quite orthodox,
and I remember
being heartily
laughed at by
several of the
officers (though
themselves
orthodox) for
quoting the
Bible as an
unanswerable
authority on
some point of
morality. I
suppose it was
the novelty of
the argument
that amused
them. But I had
gradually come,
by this time, to
see that the Old
Testament; from
its manifestly
false history of
the world, with
the Tower of
Babel, the
rainbow as a
sign, etc.,
etc., and from
its attributing
to God the
feelings of a
revengeful
tyrant, was no
more to be
trusted than the
sacred books of
the Hindoos, or
the beliefs of
any barbarian."
(Charles Darwin:
The
Autobiography of
Charles Darwin
with original
omissions
restored. New
York, Norton,
1969. p.85)
- "By further
reflecting that
the clearest
evidence would
be requisite to
make any sane
man believe in
the miracles by
which
Christianity is
supported,
--that the more
we know of the
fixed laws of
nature the more
incredible, do
miracles become,
--that the men
at that time
were ignorant
and credulous to
a degree almost
incomprehensible
by us, --that
the Gospels
cannot be proved
to have been
written
simultaneously
with the events,
--that they
differ in many
important
details, far too
important as it
seemed to me to
be admitted as
the usual
inaccuracies of
eyewitness; --by
such reflections
as these, which
I give not as
having the least
novelty or
value, but as
they influenced
me, I gradually
came to
disbelieve in
Christianity as
a divine
revelation. The
fact that many
false religions
have spread over
large portions
of the earth
like wild-fire
had some weight
with me.
Beautiful as is
the morality of
the New
Testament, it
can hardly be
denied that its
perfection
depends in part
on the
interpretation
which we now put
on metaphors and
allegories."
(p.86)
- "Thus
disbelief crept
over me at a
very slow rate,
but at last was
complete. The
rate was so slow
that I felt no
distress, and
have never since
doubted even for
a single second
that my
conclusion was
correct." (p.87)
- "I can
indeed hardly
see how anyone
ought to wish
Christianity to
be true; for if
so the plain
language of the
text seems to
show that the
men who do not
believe, and
this would
include my
Father, Brother
and almost all
my best friends,
will be
everlastingly
punished. And
this is a
damnable
doctrine." (p.
87)
- "The old
argument of
design in
nature, as given
by Paley, which
formerly seemed
to me so
conclusive,
fails, now that
the law of
natural
selection had
been discovered.
We can no longer
argue that, for
instance, the
beautiful hinge
of a bivalve
shell must have
been made by an
intelligent
being, like the
hinge of a door
by man. There
seems to be no
more design in
the variability
of organic
beings and in
the action of
natural
selection, than
in the course
which the wind
blows.
Everything in
nature is the
result of fixed
laws." (p.87)
- "At the
present day (ca.
1872) the most
usual argument
for the
existence of an
intelligent God
is drawn from
the deep inward
conviction and
feelings which
are experienced
by moat persons.
But it cannot be
doubted that
Hindoos,
Mahomadans and
others might
argue in the
same manner and
with equal force
in favor of the
existence of one
God, or of many
Gods, or as with
the Buddists of
no God...This
argument would
be a valid one
if all men of
all races had
the same inward
conviction of
the existence of
one God: but we
know that this
is very far from
being the case.
Therefore I
cannot see that
such inward
convictions and
feelings are of
any weight as
evidence of what
really exists."
(p.91)
- "Nor must we
overlook the
probability of
the constant
inculcation in a
belief in God on
the minds of
children
producing so
strong and
perhaps as
inherited effect
on their brains
not yet fully
developed, that
it would be as
difficult for
them to throw
off their belief
in God, as for a
monkey to throw
off its
instinctive fear
and hatred of a
snake." (p.93)